Many many thanks to all who participated in the International Communication Survey, a survey of transnationals living in the United States and how they use media.
146 qualified respondents completed the survey!
Respondents were recruited through three outreach efforts: an email announcement, a general message board announcement, and short announcements posted to three branded social networks (Facebook, Twitter, and Google’s recently launched Buzz service). All respondents were asked general demographic questions along with a series of questions to identify media habits and frequency. Full results coming in April!
Posted in Uncategorized
Tags: 2010, April, branded social networks, Buzz, facebook, frequency, Google, international, international communication survey, media, media habits, media use, online, recruitment, results, Survey, transnational, Twitter, United States
Did you move to the US from another country? Take this 15 minute online survey and win a $25 gift card to Amazon.com!
The survey is now closed. Thanks to all who participated!
We’ll ask you about yourself and how you use media like books, TV, and the Internet. All of your answers will be kept confidential, and results will be reported anonymously. The deadline to win one of the $25 gift cards is midnight March 6, 2010, so hurry before it’s too late!
Thank you so much for your help! The more people who take the survey, the stronger and more interesting the results will be.
I look forward to publicly sharing the results of the survey in April 2010.
Posted in Survey
Tags: amazon, contest, international, internet, media, online, prizes, Research, Survey, transnational, winners
Request for Consent
I, Deepthi Welaratna, would like to ask for your participation in a survey on the use of media for my thesis in Media Studies at The New School. The purpose of this consent form is to give you the information you will need to help you decide whether or not to complete the survey. This process is called ‘informed consent.’
Purpose and Benefits
The International Communication Survey asks questions about your background and use of media in order to better understand transnational communication habits. In exchange for your participation in this survey, you will be entered into a drawing for one of four (4) gift cards to Amazon.com worth $25 each. There are no other personal benefits to participating in this survey.
Procedures and Participation
The survey will take approximately fifteen (15) minutes to complete. You will be asked questions about your personal history and the ways in which you use media in your daily life. You may exit the survey at any time if you do not wish to answer any of the questions. You will not be asked to disclose any private information other than standard demographic information. The data will be confidential and only the researcher will have access to the data. SurveyMonkey will not use the information collected from this surveys in any way, shape, or form. Identifiable information will be used only for the purposes of the drawing or to contact you if you agree to participate in future studies and follow-up interviews. Participation in this survey is entirely voluntary. You may refuse to participate or withdraw from participation at any time without jeopardizing your employment, student status or any other entitlements.
Contact Information
If at any time you have questions regarding the research or your participation, you should contact the investigator, Deepthi Welaratna, who will answer all questions. She can be reached at (XXX) XXX-XXXX (c) or XXXX@newschool.edu.
Participant’s Statement
I have read the above purpose of the study, and understand my role in participating in the research. I volunteer to take part in this research. I understand that I may refuse to participate or withdraw from participation at any time without jeopardizing my employment, student status or other rights to which I am entitled. I certify that I am 18 years of age or older and freely give my consent to participate in this study.
If you agree to participate in this survey, please enter your name and contact information at the end of the survey. This information will also be used for the purposes of the drawing mentioned above.
The International Communication Survey is here! Take this online survey to learn more about your own media habits. Then check back with us in April to find out the official results.
The survey should take about 15 minutes to complete online, and takers will be entered to win a $25 gift card to Amazon.com. Four people will win! The survey will close at 12am on March 6, 2010.
OFFICIAL CONTEST RULES
1. The contest can be entered by filling out the online survey in full and entering a valid email address where indicated. Anyone is eligible to enter with a valid email address, and fulfillment is subject to Amazon’s terms and conditions.
2. The contest will run from the survey posting date until midnight March 6, 2010. A random draw will be made after the closing date from all eligible entries received on or before the contest closing date. Following the draw, all selected entrants will be sent a gift card worth USD $25 by email which must be redeemed according to Amazon’s terms and conditions. Four (4) winners will be selected.
3. The chances of being selected depend upon the number of eligible entries received.
Richard Rushfield has written a fascinating account of trying to chronicle his mid-80s college years. In the post-James Frey era, Rushfield writes, no effort to doublecheck the past can be spared, but the past has just been multiplied by the number of characters in your story when they’re all on Facebook. It seems the past will not only come back with a vengeance but will also bring along some photographic evidence to counter your faulty memories.
I still have a problem with what to call social networks like Facebook; social networking site doesn’t quite cover it all. It seems I’m not alone in thinking this, since there’s a range of terminology being used across the spectrum of public discourse in the popular press and in academic circles (social networking sites, social network sites, social networking services, online social networks, etc.). My choice? Branded social networks, which will be employed exclusively on UIO. Keep reading for why I don’t use social networking sites or any other alternatives, and what in my view makes branded social network the most accurate term.
Wikipedia’s entry, for example, terms them social networking services. According to Wikipedia’s editors, a social networking service “focuses on building online communities of people who share interests and/or activities, or who are interested in exploring the interests and activities of others.” danah boyd and Nicole Ellison also interrogate the terminology, arguing for a comprehensive definition under the name social network sites, as opposed to the more common social networking sites that continues to dominate the popular press today. boyd and Ellison write, “We define social network sites as web-based services that allow individuals to (1) construct a public or semi-public profile within a bounded system, (2) articulate a list of other users with whom they share a connection, and (3) view and traverse their list of connections and those made by others within the system.”
As a basic definition of the main characteristics these networks share in common, boyd and Ellison provide an excellent starting point. And their attempt at refining the terminology makes a fine and necessary distinction between the nature and activities in these networks: “‘Networking’ emphasizes relationship initiation, often between strangers… What makes social network sites unique is not that they allow individuals to meet strangers, but rather that they enable users to articulate and make visible their social networks.”
Nevertheless, I would argue that there are two key omissions of characteristics of these networks embedded in the terms social networking sites or social network sites, and one by social network services that could be rectified with yet another shift in terminology to branded social networks. In 2009, it makes sense to drop the word “site” as it limits access points to browser interfaces, while many networks are now regularly accessed through a variety of mobile device applications. In addition, many of these networks host events in the offline world as opposed to the online, and much of the activity that takes place on these networks can be described as coordination of “real world” or offline activities (argued by Donald Roberts and Ulla Foehr). Thus, the boundary between online and offline worlds is both permeable and fluid so no limitation is necessary.
Finally, it makes sense to include the more commercially-oriented vocabulary of branded because branding is the central organizing principle of these networks. Many members are proud to be affiliated with one network, and have actively rejected identification with another. This aspect of brand affiliation cannot be ignored in discussing how members engage with each other and with the networks themselves. In addition, the dominant networks that exist are for-profit companies, and their networks and members are big business. To ignore this element of BSNs is to preclude a discussion of motives and catalysts for certain types of growth and use.
That’s it, let me know what you think in the comments.
Posted in Research
Tags: branded social networks, branding, danah boyd, definition, Donald Roberts, facebook, nicole ellison, social network sites, social networking sites, terminology, Ulla Foehr
UIO’s Facebook Page has launched, and we hope you’ll join us for great discussions about the intersection of globalization and digital culture. We’re also looking for international transplants in New York for interviews and more. If you are interested, please get in touch!
The Independent in the UK has a lengthy and wide-ranging, if highly skewed towards the negative, piece on how the capabilities of memory have vastly expanded in the digital age. The examples may be a little trite and the conclusions narrow, but there’s plenty to think about here. Hoping to come back and expand on this later.
Great data from Ingene about social networking trends and attitudes among Indians both in India and abroad.It turns out Orkut isn’t only beloved in Brazil, it’s also the most popular branded social network in India — a staggering 94% of Indian youth have an account with Orkut. Facebook comes in next at 57%.
